Informal Invalidity Proceeding - Cost effective than USPTO/Court Proceeding

  • Home
  • About us
  • Patent Services
    • Patent Invalidation
    • Freedom to operate search
    • Patent infringement
    • Patentability search
    • Patent Drafting
    • Patent Filing
  • Patent defense option
    • Informal proceeding
    • Inter-Parte review
    • Post-grant review
    • Ex parte reexamination
    • Court Proceeding (formal)
    • Motion to dismiss(formal)
  • Testimonials
  • Awards
  • Contact us
  • Our team
  • More
    • Home
    • About us
    • Patent Services
      • Patent Invalidation
      • Freedom to operate search
      • Patent infringement
      • Patentability search
      • Patent Drafting
      • Patent Filing
    • Patent defense option
      • Informal proceeding
      • Inter-Parte review
      • Post-grant review
      • Ex parte reexamination
      • Court Proceeding (formal)
      • Motion to dismiss(formal)
    • Testimonials
    • Awards
    • Contact us
    • Our team

  • Home
  • About us
  • Patent Services
    • Patent Invalidation
    • Freedom to operate search
    • Patent infringement
    • Patentability search
    • Patent Drafting
    • Patent Filing
  • Patent defense option
    • Informal proceeding
    • Inter-Parte review
    • Post-grant review
    • Ex parte reexamination
    • Court Proceeding (formal)
    • Motion to dismiss(formal)
  • Testimonials
  • Awards
  • Contact us
  • Our team

Ex Parte Reexamination

Ex Parte Reexamination Overview

 Ex Parte Reexamination is a separate post-grant proceeding that differs from AIA proceedings like Post-Grant Review (PGR) and Inter Partes Review (IPR). It is not conducted before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) but instead handled by USPTO examiners. 

Key Features Ex Parte Reexamination

Who Can Request?

  • Anyone (third parties or the patent owner).
     
  • Anonymous requests are allowed. 

Timing

 Can be requested at any time during the life of the patent. 

Grounds for Challenge

  • Only §§ 102 (novelty) and 103 (obviousness) based on patents and printed publications.
     
  • No challenges based on § 101 (subject matter eligibility) or § 112 (written description, enablement, indefiniteness).
     

Participation

Limited participation for third-party requesters—after filing the request, the proceeding is only between the patent owner and the USPTO.
 

Estoppel

 No formal estoppel provisions, so challengers can attempt other proceedings later. Limited participation for third-party requesters—after filing the request, the proceeding is only between the patent owner and the USPTO.
 

Decision Makers

  USPTO examiners
 

Participation

 Only the patent owner interacts with the USPTO
 

Copyright © 2025 PatseanIP - All Rights Reserved.


Announcement

Welcome! Check out our Patent services

Learn more

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept